<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wine Opinions Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/</link>
	<description>The Supreme Court of the United States blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote for Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6814</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote for Judges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6814</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pop a Cork&lt;/strong&gt;
From the standpoint of outcome, a great decision. Pop a cork on that California wine delivered directly to your door. And drink a toast to the late, great Constitution.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pop a Cork</strong></p>
<p>From the standpoint of outcome, a great decision. Pop a cork on that California wine delivered directly to your door. And drink a toast to the late, great Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardZ.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6813</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardZ.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 02:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6813</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wine In The News&lt;/strong&gt;
I was pleasantly surprised to see my parish from back in Erie featured in the Erie Times today. The feature story discussed First Communion and had a picture of a beautiful little girl recieving the Body of Christ from Fr....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wine In The News</strong></p>
<p>I was pleasantly surprised to see my parish from back in Erie featured in the Erie Times today. The feature story discussed First Communion and had a picture of a beautiful little girl recieving the Body of Christ from Fr&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 02:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>Like everyone else who follows the Court, I am always fascinated by an unusual 5-4 split.  I do not recall having seen another case with this particular alingment of Justices (although I have not checked to see if it has happened before).  Booker, Blakely, Kyllo and the Playboy case are some of the others that grabbed my attention with an interesting division between the majority and dissenting opinions.  In my opinion, those cases that depart from the most common 5-4 split (The Rehnquist Five, as some have called it) tend to demonstrate the extraordinary jurisprudential depth that has resulted from the interaction of these nine Justices during the past decade.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like everyone else who follows the Court, I am always fascinated by an unusual 5-4 split.  I do not recall having seen another case with this particular alingment of Justices (although I have not checked to see if it has happened before).  Booker, Blakely, Kyllo and the Playboy case are some of the others that grabbed my attention with an interesting division between the majority and dissenting opinions.  In my opinion, those cases that depart from the most common 5-4 split (The Rehnquist Five, as some have called it) tend to demonstrate the extraordinary jurisprudential depth that has resulted from the interaction of these nine Justices during the past decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the pilcrow press</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6812</link>
		<dc:creator>the pilcrow press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6812</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;One nation, under the influence&lt;/strong&gt;
As for the court&#039;s reasoning, from what I&#039;ve read, I have no qualms with it. It seems eminently reasonable to interpret the Twenty-First Amendment in a way that is consistent with the rest of the Constitution, especially the power of Congress to regu...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One nation, under the influence</strong></p>
<p>As for the court&#8217;s reasoning, from what I&#8217;ve read, I have no qualms with it. It seems eminently reasonable to interpret the Twenty-First Amendment in a way that is consistent with the rest of the Constitution, especially the power of Congress to regu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorBainbridge.com</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6811</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorBainbridge.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 19:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6811</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Background on the Supreme Court Wine Shipment Decision&lt;/strong&gt;
My TCS columns discuss the legal issues:Bacchus Bytes Back The Grapes of Protectionist WrathSCOTUS blog has links to the pdf files of the Supreme Court&#039;s opinions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Background on the Supreme Court Wine Shipment Decision</strong></p>
<p>My TCS columns discuss the legal issues:Bacchus Bytes Back The Grapes of Protectionist WrathSCOTUS blog has links to the pdf files of the Supreme Court&#8217;s opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secure Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6810</link>
		<dc:creator>Secure Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 18:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6810</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Grapes Are Free!&lt;/strong&gt;
Wine lovers rejoice!  For several years I have been a proponet of the cause supported by the group Free The Grapes, namely, reasonable direct shipment of wine between states.  The Supreme Court, after a string of lousy decisions, got one right this tim...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Grapes Are Free!</strong></p>
<p>Wine lovers rejoice!  For several years I have been a proponet of the cause supported by the group Free The Grapes, namely, reasonable direct shipment of wine between states.  The Supreme Court, after a string of lousy decisions, got one right this tim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Stitch in Haste</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6809</link>
		<dc:creator>A Stitch in Haste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 17:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6809</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court Strikes Down Out-of-State Wine Laws&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCOTUSblog is reporting that the Supreme Court has struck down the two state laws that banned the direct sale of wine to consumers from out...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court Strikes Down Out-of-State Wine Laws</strong></p>
<p>SCOTUSblog is reporting that the Supreme Court has struck down the two state laws that banned the direct sale of wine to consumers from out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6808</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6808</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SUPREME COURT&#039;S DECISION TO FREE THE GRAPES&lt;/strong&gt;
Lynne Kiesling Today the Supreme Court struck down the interstate wine shipment bans in several U.S. states. SCOTUSblog has the links to the decision documents. I&#039;ve posted frequently here on the topic. According to this Wired story, By a 5-4...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SUPREME COURT&#8217;S DECISION TO FREE THE GRAPES</strong></p>
<p>Lynne Kiesling Today the Supreme Court struck down the interstate wine shipment bans in several U.S. states. SCOTUSblog has the links to the decision documents. I&#8217;ve posted frequently here on the topic. According to this Wired story, By a 5-4&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Dork, J.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Dork, J.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 17:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You Wine Some, You Lose Some&lt;/strong&gt;
Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in today&#039;s decision in Granholm v. Heald, the wine-shipping cases, with the Court holding that the Twenty-first Amendment does not trump the Commerce Clause when the two come in conflict. As I explain in...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You Wine Some, You Lose Some</strong></p>
<p>Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in today&#8217;s decision in Granholm v. Heald, the wine-shipping cases, with the Court holding that the Twenty-first Amendment does not trump the Commerce Clause when the two come in conflict. As I explain in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New World Man - anything can happen</title>
		<link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/05/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6806</link>
		<dc:creator>New World Man - anything can happen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 16:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/wine-opinions-links/#comment-6806</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;O&#039;Connor against the grain&lt;/strong&gt;
The wine shipment opinion is out (link is to syllabus PDF, see here for links to all opinions), and far more learned analysis of it will come from elsewhere than here. I will just point out that it includes two rare Ms. Justice O&#039;Connor-related feature...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>O&#8217;Connor against the grain</strong></p>
<p>The wine shipment opinion is out (link is to syllabus PDF, see here for links to all opinions), and far more learned analysis of it will come from elsewhere than here. I will just point out that it includes two rare Ms. Justice O&#8217;Connor-related feature&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

