Comments on: Title IX rights expanded http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/03/title-ix-rights-expanded/ The Supreme Court of the United States blog Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:38:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Brian Galle http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/03/title-ix-rights-expanded/#comment-6478 Brian Galle Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:14:25 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/title-ix-rights-expanded/#comment-6478 Not to pick nits with the headline of the post, but the central point of the majority opinion is that its holding is not an "expansion" but an affirmation of the scope of Title IX. It is the dissent that contends that allowing claims for employer retribution unfairly "expands" Title IX in a way that states accepting funds did not expect and that Congress did not clearly demand. Not to pick nits with the headline of the post, but the central point of the majority opinion is that its holding is not an “expansion” but an affirmation of the scope of Title IX. It is the dissent that contends that allowing claims for employer retribution unfairly “expands” Title IX in a way that states accepting funds did not expect and that Congress did not clearly demand.

]]> By: Ex Post http://www.scotusblog.com/2005/03/title-ix-rights-expanded/#comment-6479 Ex Post Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:45:33 +0000 http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/uncategorized/title-ix-rights-expanded/#comment-6479 <strong>The O'C, Where All the Laws Are Good Looking</strong> Justice O'Connor has broken bad again, this time siding with the liberal foursome to achieve good results in Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed. O'Connor's opinion holds that Title IX's implied private right of action for discrimination "on the basis of... The O’C, Where All the Laws Are Good Looking

Justice O’Connor has broken bad again, this time siding with the liberal foursome to achieve good results in Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed. O’Connor’s opinion holds that Title IX’s implied private right of action for discrimination “on the basis of…

]]>